Toshiba Satellite C650D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite C650D  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100902
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateApr 20 '20 at 15:16
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD V120
Socket S1G4, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Memory 29.9
1-Core 25.3
2-Core 27.7
19% 27.6 Pts
4-Core 28.2
8-Core 30.4
4% 29.3 Pts
64-Core 31.2
2% 31.2 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4250
Toshiba(1179 FDE4) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.23
Parallax 0.47
0% 0.78 fps
MRender 0.86
Gravity 0.13
Splatting 1.22
1% 0.74 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX002V
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 41 49 38 37 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 59.7
Write 71.8
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 44.6
37% 50.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston TSB1066D3S7DR8/2G 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.57 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 255
16% 255 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite C650D Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C650D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback