Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Precision WorkStation T7500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0D881F
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 14:09
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon L5640
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 120
57% 90.1 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 320
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
MSI(1462 2960) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.4% Average
Lighting 58.4
Reflection 53.1
Parallax 70.1
48% 60.5 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 66.5
Splatting 51
50% 62.6 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 40 41 39 40 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.1% Very poor
Read 75
Write 95.3
Mixed 86
SusWrite 42.9
17% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 7.6
38% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 50.6
DQ Write 51.2
DQ Mixed 52.7
39% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 101%
Seagate ST3300655SS 300GB
277GB free
Firmware: 0002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 77 92 92 87 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
59% Above average
Read 120
Write 106
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 84.8
68% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.5
268% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59%
Great: 70%
Hitachi HCS54505 500GB
215GB free
Firmware: A5DG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 42 47 48 46 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 42
Write 51.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 44.7
31% 41.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$38
404GB free
Firmware: GKAOAB0A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 45 49 48 49 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 53.7
Mixed 34
SusWrite 45.5
35% 47.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
36.9% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 9.2
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision WorkStation T7500 Builds (Compare 1,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard

System: Dell Precision WorkStation T7500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback