Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 270E5J/2570EJ  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP270E5J-K04CN
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150623
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 23 '20 at 22:46
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 82.1
1-Core 46.1
2-Core 92.5
48% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 174
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M
Sanyo(144D C737) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9101
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 5.38
Parallax 3.94
4% 4.7 fps
MRender 4.48
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 5.43
4% 5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon LCH-256V2S 256GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: WC87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 323 265 216 180 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
103% Outstanding
Read 505
Write 326
Mixed 324
SusWrite 220
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 127
4K Mixed 48
186% 71 MB/s
DQ Read 304
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 201
174% 258 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 8.4 8.3 8.3 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Read 22.4
Write 5.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 8.4
15% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.9
49% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Smart SH564128FJ8NWRNSQG 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 9.1
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.7 GB/s
Latency 76.7
52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 270E5J/2570EJ Builds (Compare 167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 270E5J/2570EJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback