Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z97M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z97M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140523
Uptime8.4 Days
Run DateMay 03 '20 at 16:31
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 184
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 348
48% 354 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
CLim: 940 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.5% Poor
Lighting 38
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 47
31% 37.4 fps
MRender 26.2
Gravity 36.8
Splatting 33.7
27% 32.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 34%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 432
Write 324
Mixed 107
63% 288 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 73.3
4K Mixed 35.6
94% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 173
160% 247 MB/s
Poor: 44% Great: 82%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
221GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 88 94 90 92 91 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 88.2
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 89
57% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
71% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52%
Great: 69%
KINGSTON SA400S37120G 120GB
20GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 57 70 69 19 47 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
141% Outstanding
Read 284
Write 326
Mixed 270
SusWrite 78.9
318% 240 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 25.2
4K Mixed 18.4
1,558% 21.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.4
DQ Write 38.6
DQ Mixed 23.2
2,189% 28.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 141%
Great: 141%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
34.8% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.5
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M Pro4 Builds (Compare 291 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97M Pro4 - $196

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback