Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176M 4,000 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Memory 41.9 1-Core 32.8 2-Core 62.1 28% 45.6 Pts	4-Core 98.1 8-Core 156 16% 127 Pts	64-Core 211 13% 211 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 89%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg5aznv1t02 NVMe SED TOSHIBA 1024GB 75 User benchmarks, average bench 169% 772GB free (System drive) Firmware: AADA5103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 470 202 129 118 111 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 374 Write 311 Mixed 346 SusWrite 251 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 18.8 54% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 159 DQ Write 63 DQ Mixed 126 90% 116 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 235%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GB 7,078 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	44% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 17.9 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 194 21% 194 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 44% Great: 89%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,636x
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples	364x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples	308x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	308x
NVMe SK hynix 512GBPc401Bench 146%, 10,182 samples	149x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	149x

RAM
HMA82GS6JJR8N-VK 2x16GBUnknownBench 80%, 6,839 samples	332x
16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E1 2x16GBUnknownBench 79%, 7,078 samples	287x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples	153x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16