| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Toshiba Satellite Pro C660 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA PWWAA |
| Memory | 5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120509 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | May 08 '20 at 18:46 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7 M 620
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
43.6%
Average
|
47% 79 Pts
|
19% 143 Pts
|
10% 156 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FD3C) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
|
0.49%
Terrible
|
0% 0.74 fps
|
0% 0.54 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 36 36 1.8 8.5 47 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
36% 161 MB/s
|
60% 20.7 MB/s
|
27% 63 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba MK7559GSXF 750GB
523GB free
Firmware: GQ005B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 56 58 63 52 58 MB/s
|
42.8%
Average
|
42% 58 MB/s
|
102% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI 8GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
21.1%
Poor
|
20% 7.07 GB/s
|
16% 5.7 GB/s
|
34% 119 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite Pro C660 Builds (Compare 74 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite Pro C660
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3 M 380Intel $130Bench 40%, 21,755 samples | 22x |
| Core i3 M 370Intel $167Bench 39%, 23,407 samples | 15x |
| Core i3-2310MIntel $80Bench 46%, 25,542 samples | 7x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 37x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 17x |
| GeForce 315MNvidiaBench 1%, 3,213 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 44% - Average | Total price: $158 |