Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 17.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3350 14,922 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Memory 21.9 1-Core 40.3 2-Core 68.4 24% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 71.5 8-Core 81.5 10% 76.5 Pts	64-Core 78 5% 78 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 15,538 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.5017 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.76% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.81 Parallax 1.75 2% 2.19 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 1.4 Splatting 2.74 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.76% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RTIMF256VGM2MBDH 256GB 129 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 213GB free (System drive) Firmware: T2002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 255 262 205 56 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 301 Write 295 Mixed 221 SusWrite 188 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 36.1 4K Mixed 11.1 44% 18.2 MB/s	DQ Read 132 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 107 84% 118 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GB 1,067 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.97 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.03 GB/s	Latency 307 13% 307 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 30%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N4200IntelBench 30%, 10,928 samples	56x
Celeron N3350IntelBench 21%, 14,922 samples	32x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 7,629 samples	45x
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	20x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 15,538 samples	12x

SSD
SSDSCKKF128G8L 128GBIntelBench 55%, 138 samples	24x
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GBBench 61%, 41,519 samples	18x
RTITF128PCA1MADL 128GBBench 52%, 89 samples	10x

RAM
MT53B256M32D1NP-062AIT:C 4x1GBMicronBench 20%, 428 samples	34x
H9HCNNN8KUMLHR 4x1GBHynixBench 18%, 593 samples	25x
K4F8E304HB-MGCJ 4x1GBSamsungBench 19%, 1,067 samples	17x