Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 81.4 2-Core 168 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 299 35% 271 Pts	64-Core 325 20% 325 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6350 2,808 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 2126) 512MB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 8.830.0.0 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23 50,270 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 40 Mixed 22.5 24% 31.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 70%
Lexar Echo 16GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 13GB free, PID a01a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 8.9 9.7 9.4 10 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	6.26% Terrible	Read 23.5 Write 2.8 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 9.5 12% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.26% Great: 9%
Micron 1 100 SATA 512GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 145% 29GB free, PID 0621 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 20 22 22 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.7% Poor	Read 31.3 Write 24.3 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 22 35% 26.3 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 5.8 419% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 236%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GB 3,798 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 8.9 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.83 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.9 22% 7.73 GB/s	Latency 66 61% 66 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	744x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	184x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	159x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	98x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	55x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 26%, 3,270 samples	40x

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278