Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (61%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T2370 714 User benchmarks, average bench 30% uPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	23.1% Poor	Memory 41.6 1-Core 16.8 2-Core 26.3 21% 28.2 Pts	4-Core 29.4 8-Core 28.4 4% 28.9 Pts	64-Core 35.8 2% 35.8 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.1% Great: 37%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 112GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 74 74 78 75 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.8% Poor	Read 112 Write 86 Mixed 87.3 SusWrite 75.9 20% 90.2 MB/s	4K Read 12.6 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 16.2 51% 16.4 MB/s	DQ Read 26.5 DQ Write 51.6 DQ Mixed 30.6 26% 36.2 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 88%
ST932032 5AS 320GB 140 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 113GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 15 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	9.26% Terrible	Read 18.7 Write 11.3 Mixed 16.3 SusWrite 16.8 21% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.26% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.32% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.2 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.33 GB/s	SC Read 0.8 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 0.3 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16