Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ67OW
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140313
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 18:47
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2500 82,538 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SKTH, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 90.6 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 150 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 305 29% 242 Pts	64-Core 334 21% 334 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1304 MHz, MLim: 1755 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Lighting 65 Reflection 65.3 Parallax 79.3 53% 69.9 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 53.3 49% 60.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ESA3SMK2STTBT240GB 240GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0526A SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 120 123 122 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 318 Write 304 Mixed 266 SusWrite 122 57% 253 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 43.2 4K Mixed 29.2 94% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 76.5 DQ Mixed 41.1 35% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 111%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$37 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 60GB free Firmware: 05.06H05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 57 56 58 58 58 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 71.7 Write 71.2 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 57.9 46% 62.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 373GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 122 124 122 122 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 116 Write 41 Mixed 63.2 SusWrite 123 63% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Kingston 99U5474-012.A00LF Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 8GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.8% Average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 13.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 66.3 60% 66.3 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PCGBLOPT58GSFF11 Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Arcelik PCGBLOPT58GSFF11

CPU
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	18x
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	4x
Core i7-2600Intel $187Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	10x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	2x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

SSD
120GB 120GBNetacBench 61%, 1,949 samples	2x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	2x
128GB 128GBTurboxBench 53%, 279 samples	2x

RAM
EBJ20EF8BCFA-DJ-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 45%, 33 samples	2x
99U5471-028.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 48%, 769 samples	1x
99U5474-028.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 44%, 3,493 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16