Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.42% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	71.5% Very good	Memory 80.2 1-Core 106 2-Core 212 75% 133 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 477 52% 409 Pts	64-Core 484 30% 484 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 15E0) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7325 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	6.42% Terrible	Lighting 6.83 Reflection 24.5 Parallax 6.72 6% 12.7 fps	MRender 6.81 Gravity 6.27 Splatting 14.5 8% 9.18 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.42% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
HFS256G32TND-N210A 256GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: 30200P10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 243 191 244 237 242 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 45% Great: 121%
Maxtor 6 V300F0 300GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 20GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.2% Poor	Read 36 Write 36.5 Mixed 31 SusWrite 38.7 49% 35.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 0.2 169% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB 144,145 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	33.6% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 9.6 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 8.7 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 80.1 50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,462x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,535x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	4x

SSD
SD8SN8U128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 65%, 7,802 samples	274x
SD8SNAT128G1002 128GBSandiskBench 56%, 12,768 samples	251x
HFS256G39TND-N210A 256GBBench 70%, 39,780 samples	204x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	666x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	313x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	186x