Acer Aspire Z5801

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire Z5801  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire Z5801
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110722
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '17 at 18:16
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600S-$235
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 159
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 383
42% 333 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
Acer(1025 0518) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 4.85
Parallax 1.22
1% 2.47 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.48
2% 1.85 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
D2CSTK251M11-0240 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 470
Write 209
Mixed 285
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 37
4K Mixed 10.1
64% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.9
DQ Write 41.6
DQ Mixed 61.2
38% 41.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 85%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB
696GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 113
Write 90.8
Mixed 119
137% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.35
62% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G ACR512X64D3S13C9G 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire Z5801 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire Z5801

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback