Asus X99-M WS/SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics36.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS/SE  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 11:20
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 3.30GHz
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 69.3
1-Core 33.1
2-Core 69.1
38% 57.2 Pts
4-Core 102
8-Core 190
17% 146 Pts
64-Core 283
18% 283 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.6% Below average
Lighting 43.4
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 57.1
35% 46.9 fps
MRender 56.5
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 38.5
39% 49 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 278 273 285 293 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 394
Write 367
Mixed 296
SusWrite 279
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 43.5
4K Mixed 26
89% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 204
153% 205 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 124%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 374GB
315GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 349 310 324 336 344 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.8% Very good
Read 436
Write 444
Mixed 352
SusWrite 335
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 45.9
4K Mixed 25.7
91% 31.3 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 222
166% 221 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 116%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 151 167 172 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 170
Mixed 81
SusWrite 159
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965600-033.A00G Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 21.8
57% 20 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 9.8
23% 8.2 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS/SE Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS/SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $615
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback