SYWZ S200 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.28% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive99.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardSYWZ S200 Series  (all builds)
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 26 '20 at 19:10
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 229
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 588
63% 501 Pts
64-Core 582
36% 582 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P630
Intel(8086 2015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 9.54
Parallax 7.72
6% 8 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 6.67
Splatting 14.4
8% 8.81 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S300-128 128GB
94GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 414 327 118 125 116 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
99.6% Outstanding
Read 435
Write 402
Mixed 388
SusWrite 254
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 42.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 46.2
181% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 240
186% 252 MB/s
USB Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.5 9.3 9.3 9.4 9.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
7% Terrible
Read 18
Write 9.2
Mixed 0.3
SusWrite 9.3
10% 9.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
57% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 7.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S200 Series Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: SYWZ S200 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback