Today's hottest deals

Dell OptiPlex 755

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemDell OptiPlex 755
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 755  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 07:19
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E6750
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
41.1% Average
Memory 72.6
1-Core 30.8
2-Core 60.7
38% 54.7 Pts
4-Core 59.9
8-Core 60.5
8% 60.2 Pts
64-Core 61.1
4% 61.1 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 44%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon X1300
Dell(1028 0402) 128MB
Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.56.1.16
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 105 117 125 111 117 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 118
Write 18.7
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 113
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 68%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 4GB
0GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.3
Write 9.5
Mixed 9
14% 12.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x1GB
3 of 4 slots used
3GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 5
16% 5.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 95.6
42% 95.6 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 755 Builds (Compare 506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 755

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback