QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.4 GB free of 1 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 16:20
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Common KVM processor
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
23.1% Poor
Memory 28.7
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 101
32% 60 Pts
4-Core 101
8-Core 105
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 98.9
6% 98.9 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 136GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 78 75 71 84 65 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.3% Very poor
Read 218
Write 162
Mixed 225
SusWrite 72.5
38% 169 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 5.3
16% 5.43 MB/s
Red Hat VirtIO 17GB
15GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 94 86 94 93 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
94.1% Outstanding
Read 236
Write 202
Mixed 225
SusWrite 89.5
141% 188 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 5.1
837% 5.07 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 94%
Red Hat VirtIO 91GB
51GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 80 76 84 92 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
90.8% Outstanding
Read 233
Write 220
Mixed 235
SusWrite 81.4
144% 192 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 5.8
948% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.8
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 263
15% 263 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $268Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $88
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback