Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive14.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 22:00
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$172
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.2% Good
Memory 82.9
1-Core 89.5
2-Core 138
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 360
42% 324 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Edge SE847-V SSD 250GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 42 27 47 24 57 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.7% Very poor
Read 174
Write 81.3
Mixed 138
SusWrite 37.3
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 0.1
15% 7.23 MB/s
DQ Read 2
DQ Write 62.9
DQ Mixed 0.5
10% 21.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 91%
Edge SE847 SSD 256GB
48GB free
Firmware: O1026A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 278 284 285 270 287 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 344
Write 265
Mixed 240
SusWrite 279
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 30.3
98% 36.1 MB/s
DQ Read 28.3
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 40.1
38% 57 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.2% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.2
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback