HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190419
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 04 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3840QM-$549
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 100
2-Core 200
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 500
56% 439 Pts
64-Core 504
31% 504 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000M
HP(103C 176C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 601 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 14.4
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 16.6
12% 14.7 fps
MRender 17.7
Gravity 17.1
Splatting 16.4
14% 17.1 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revoluti ONS500_256OEM 256GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S091
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 17 18 18 19 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
Read 480
Write 395
Mixed 345
SusWrite 51.7
71% 318 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 22.7
98% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 78.4
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 0.3
60% 137 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 61%
Samsung 860 EVO mSAT 500GB
73GB free
Firmware: RVT4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 240 230 241 239 239 MB/s
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
71.6% Very good
Read 255
Write 240
Mixed 240
SusWrite 235
55% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 49.8
4K Mixed 38.1
123% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 42.1
72% 140 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 122%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
194GB free
Firmware: 0004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 101 99 102 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 71.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 100
60% 81.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 62%
23GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 1.6 1.8 2 1.9 1.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
1.55% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 2
Mixed 1.5
SusWrite 1.8
2% 1.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.55%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.7% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 15.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 17.2
SC Mixed 17.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback