Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	443% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 838F
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180109
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 10:20
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 87.6 1-Core 105 2-Core 207 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 555 59% 471 Pts	64-Core 555 34% 555 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	30.5% Below average	Lighting 37.9 Reflection 28.1 Parallax 29.2 31% 31.7 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 38.2 Splatting 34 30% 36.6 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Liteon CA1-8D256-HP 256GB 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: A182 SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 35 37 37 30 15 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	443% Outstanding	Read 5,008 Write 45.5 Mixed 91 SusWrite 29.1 269% 1,293 MB/s	4K Read 595 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 5.8 910% 201 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 443% Great: 170%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB 145,911 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 460GB free Firmware: RXM3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 140 143 144 145 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 61.5 Write 145 Mixed 54 SusWrite 142 73% 101 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 95%
Seagate Expansion 1.5TB 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 127 128 129 131 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 100 Write 134 Mixed 89 SusWrite 130 83% 113 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 66%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6H1 2x8GB 1,913 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	MC Read 31.2 MC Write 30.8 MC Mixed 23.4 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 24.4 66% 22.9 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 79%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	1,350x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	785x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	778x

SSD
MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 8,655 samples	293x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	273x
CA1-8D128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 117%, 4,097 samples	158x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	350x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	308x
HP26D4S9S8MH-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 70%, 2,916 samples	191x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16