Asus P5N-D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P5N-D  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '20 at 01:32
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
47.1% Average
Memory 74.5
1-Core 30.2
2-Core 59.8
38% 54.8 Pts
4-Core 118
8-Core 112
16% 115 Pts
64-Core 114
7% 114 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 20.3
20% 20.2 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 20.7
14% 16.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvidia STRIPE 931.52G 1TB
837GB free (System drive)
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 30 87 129 156 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 63
Write 38.1
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 99.9
42% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 121%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
922GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 114 115 121 121 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 116
Write 118
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 115
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
925GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 101 102 103 110 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.4% Good
Read 111
Write 92.1
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 103
66% 90.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 84 85 94 101 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 121
Write 111
Mixed 62.4
SusWrite 92.7
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 69%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 84 85 93 98 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 118
Write 116
Mixed 59.7
SusWrite 92
71% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 3.5
12% 4.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.4 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5N-D Builds (Compare 91 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback