Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive49.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '20 at 04:07
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 140
2-Core 280
95% 171 Pts
4-Core 543
8-Core 1,070
95% 806 Pts
64-Core 1,138
70% 1,138 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.59
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 93.7
Parallax 85.5
85% 94.4 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 90.7
Splatting 77.8
74% 91.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF400400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 139 136 116 124 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 394
Write 311
Mixed 276
SusWrite 146
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 37.6
4K Mixed 15.8
72% 24.8 MB/s
DQ Read 67
DQ Write 95.2
DQ Mixed 34.2
39% 65.5 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
882GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 168 169 166 169 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 156
Mixed 108
SusWrite 168
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
49GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 4.4 11 4.5 8.7 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.9% Terrible
Read 31.2
Write 26.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 7
29% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 9.9%
Great: 70%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
251GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0 0.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 33
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 0.2
29% 23 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
112% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 70%
MB4000GC WDC 4TB
132GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 6.5 5.7 6 5.8 5.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.94% Terrible
Read 33.5
Write 6.8
Mixed 10.8
SusWrite 6
15% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.94%
Great: 35%
WDC WD60 EZAZ-00ZGHB0 6TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.2 0 0.3 0 4.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 30.5
Write 30.8
Mixed 23
SusWrite 0.9
27% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.5
238% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 23.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 24.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,393 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $422
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback