Today's hottest deals

XMG P65xHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemXMG P65xHP  (all builds)
MotherboardXMG P65xHP
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '17 at 15:45
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 100
2-Core 195
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 538
56% 449 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 65A4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 376.74
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 60.2
54% 66.7 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 71.1
56% 68.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 275GB-$42
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR031 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 472
Write 329
Mixed 333
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 20.6
101% 38.4 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 32.6
72% 148 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78%
Great: 95%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
793GB free
Firmware: SDM1
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
49% Average
Read 102
Write 69.5
Mixed 55.1
56% 75.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.04
4K Write 0.13
4K Mixed 0.03
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 49%
Great: 70%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
576GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 47.7
Write 67.1
Mixed 63.9
81% 59.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.12
4K Mixed 0.06
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4S240FSD.16FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 25.9
80% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 78%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65xHP Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: XMG P65xHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback