MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A34)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A34
MotherboardMSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A34)  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '20 at 16:30
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 73.7
1-Core 98.2
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 770
69% 583 Pts
64-Core 1,145
71% 1,145 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gainward(10B0 1184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 34.2
Reflection 38.1
Parallax 53.8
28% 42 fps
MRender 50.3
Gravity 45.3
Splatting 36.9
35% 44.2 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disk drive 240GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 45 51 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 356
Write 208
Mixed 139
SusWrite 60.6
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 0.2
26% 9.3 MB/s
DQ Read 36.6
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 12.4
13% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 102%
Sandisk PLUS 480 GB 480GB
101GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 64 128 108 175 177 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 391
Write 322
Mixed 272
SusWrite 151
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 11.2
36% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 79.3
DQ Write 21.4
DQ Mixed 39.9
32% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 57%
Nvme CT1000P 1TB
538GB free
Firmware: P3CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 684 765 736 694 729 785 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 893
Write 915
Mixed 744
SusWrite 732
185% 821 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 20.4
64% 20.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.9
DQ Write 70.1
DQ Mixed 73.4
55% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 104%
Great: 299%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
78GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 98 97 97 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 120
Write 113
Mixed 84.9
SusWrite 97.4
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 2TB
484GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 40 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 38.3
Write 37.9
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 38.7
49% 36.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2666C16/8G BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FBD KHX2666C16/8G BLT8G4D26AFTA.16FBD 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 27.5
85% 29.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 23.9
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A34) Builds (Compare 218 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI B350 TOMAHAWK ARCTIC (MS-7A34)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback