Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190618
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 22:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 81
1-Core 148
2-Core 288
93% 172 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 861
89% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1400 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
57% Above average
Lighting 71.9
Reflection 71.8
Parallax 99.4
59% 81 fps
MRender 71.7
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 58
54% 67.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3SMF2HTGT120GB 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1027A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 133 129 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 450
Write 128
Mixed 131
SusWrite 131
46% 210 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 96.4
4K Mixed 10.3
90% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 55
62% 105 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 57%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
671GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 160 167 167 167 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 141
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 164
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 32.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 31.1
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback