Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T7200-$90 2,351 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	Memory 52.3 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 45.1 28% 40.2 Pts	4-Core 44.2 8-Core 41.7 6% 43 Pts	64-Core 44.8 3% 44.8 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon X1700 41 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Asus(1043 1242) 512MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.352.0.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.47% Terrible	Lighting 0.87 Reflection 1.42 Parallax 0.47 1% 0.92 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.47% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM320JI 320GB 1,198 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 127GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2SS00_01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 35 26 40 29 39 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	21.4% Poor	Read 42.5 Write 42 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 32 27% 36.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 36%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 250GB 651 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 66GB free, PID 5583, SanDisk Ultra Fit 3.1 256GB Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 14 14 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 27 Write 13.5 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 14.5 23% 18.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.1 94% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.3 11% 3.7 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM