Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	71.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	74.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 84% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PH315-52 (all builds)
Motherboard	CFL Covini_CFS
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200302
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '20 at 06:07
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%
CPU Throttled	84%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	Memory 87.4 1-Core 128 2-Core 238 85% 151 Pts	4-Core 503 8-Core 774 79% 638 Pts	64-Core 1,035 64% 1,035 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Acer(1025 1343) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.4% Very good	Lighting 88.4 Reflection 81.2 Parallax 80.2 72% 83.3 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 80.4 Splatting 77.2 70% 87.2 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 72%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Acer(1025 1343) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	7.31% Terrible	Lighting 6.97 Reflection 12 Parallax 8.69 6% 9.21 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 7.4 Splatting 16.4 10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.31% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GB 4,910 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 235 175 86 102 108 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	74.6% Very good	Read 672 Write 263 Mixed 290 SusWrite 160 76% 346 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 41.1 4K Mixed 21.6 87% 29.1 MB/s	DQ Read 410 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 206 166% 242 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.6% Great: 130%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 57GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 402 314 313 313 303 313 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Read 498 Write 409 Mixed 418 SusWrite 326 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 34.1 4K Write 44.2 4K Mixed 33.3 118% 37.2 MB/s	DQ Read 359 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 226 170% 235 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 129%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 7,128 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 150GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 1.5 5 3.7 2.7 2.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Read 106 Write 88 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 12.2 60% 53.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 35% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 52%
Toshiba External USB HDD 500GB 136 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 54GB free, PID a003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 36 37 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	16.9% Very poor	Read 35 Write 35 Mixed 25 SusWrite 36.8 45% 33 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 60% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB 17,072 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	78.8% Very good	MC Read 31.4 MC Write 29.6 MC Mixed 22.4 79% 27.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.6 SC Write 29.8 SC Mixed 26.5 71% 25 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 78.8% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 3,915 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

CPU
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	3,355x
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	558x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,802x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	1,503x
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	607x

SSD
KINGSTON RBUSNS8 256GBNvmeBench 103%, 4,910 samples	360x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GBNvmeBench 159%, 3,211 samples	339x
WDC PC SN720 SDA 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 3,501 samples	303x

RAM
ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 17,072 samples	1,239x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 76%, 29,128 samples	796x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	208x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16