CDM P8Q77-M2

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	27.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	CDM P8Q77-M2 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK P8Q77-M2
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130415
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	70%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 89.5 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 123 59% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 247 8-Core 365 38% 306 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	83.2% Excellent	Lighting 107 Reflection 115 Parallax 105 87% 109 fps	MRender 85.5 Gravity 103 Splatting 90 76% 92.7 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 126 97 90 65 58 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.3% Poor	Read 184 Write 178 Mixed 162 SusWrite 102 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 14.7 4K Mixed 9.3 32% 10.8 MB/s	DQ Read 99.9 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 34.9 39% 67 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 771GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 180 174 167 168 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 87 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 171 94% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 109% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-065.A00LF 99U5471-050.A00LF 16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (18^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	50.2% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 16.6 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 11 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 67.8 59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Q77-M2 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: CDM P8Q77-M2

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	21x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	11x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	9x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	3x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	3x
MZ7TD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 55%, 4,607 samples	2x

RAM
9905458-026.A00LF Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 6GBKingstonBench 29%, 8 samples	5x
9905458-026.A00LF Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 Hynix HMT325U7BFR8C-H9 8GBKingstonBench 37%, 6 samples	4x
99U5474-020.A00LF 9905471-017.A00LF 99U5474-037.A00LF 9905471-011.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 41%, 6 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $481

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16