| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 65.8% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Alienware Area-51m (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware Alienware Area-51m |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191028 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 28 '20 at 02:27 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 11% |
PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
32.2%
Below average
|
27% 40.9 Pts
|
18% 150 Pts
|
12% 195 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.49
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
65.8%
Good
|
49% 80.8 fps
|
99% 124 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvme PC SN520 WD 256GB
204GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 475 379 371 382 402 384 MB/s
|
98.5%
Outstanding
|
171% 758 MB/s
|
100% 32.4 MB/s
|
182% 240 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
931GB free
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 125 127 125 120 MB/s
|
72.1%
Very good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
520% 3.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
40.4%
Average
|
44% 15.6 GB/s
|
22% 7.67 GB/s
|
22% 179 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 537 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware Area-51m
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 217x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 186x |
| Core i7-9700Intel $260Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 101x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 112%, 4,380 samples | 204x |
| GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples | 94x |
| RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples | 82x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $410 |