TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M S2H  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 29 '20 at 17:02
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$86
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 74
1-Core 141
2-Core 281
88% 165 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 812
82% 663 Pts
64-Core 1,017
63% 1,017 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑
This bench: 84.9%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Asus(1043 836D) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.37
Reflection 5
Parallax 3.87
4% 4.41 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 3.53%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 6.8 3 86 25 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 446
Write 386
Mixed 257
SusWrite 70.9
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 20.1
75% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 91.8
DQ Mixed 41.8
48% 83.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 49.9%
 Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32
386GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 118 118 120 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 68
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 68.3%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905734-059.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.5% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 17.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 18.7
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 53.5%
 Great: 53%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-B450M S2H Builds (Compare 6,752 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M S2H

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples1,195x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples1,170x
Ryzen 5 1600AFAMD  $120Bench 72%, 52,721 samples445x
GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples548x
RX 570AMD  $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples490x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples443x
SSD
SSD 500GBKioxia-exceriaBench 175%, 10,941 samples189x
SU630 480GBAdataBench 67%, 31,107 samples188x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples170x
RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples369x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 82%, 52,667 samples343x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples311x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback