Today's hottest deals

HP 3125

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 3125  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18D4
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130412
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 00:12
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1500 APU (2012 M.Za)
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Memory 49.6
1-Core 16.2
2-Core 30
24% 31.9 Pts
4-Core 25.7
8-Core 27.1
4% 26.4 Pts
64-Core 32.8
2% 32.8 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
HP(103C 18D4) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.152.0.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.9% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 1.42
Parallax 1.34
1% 1.28 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.67
Splatting 1.35
1% 1.16 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.9%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mknssdtr 128GB-3DL 128GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q061
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 230 78 8.4 19 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
Read 346
Write 296
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 61.4
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.2
12% 3.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BAU0-AE-E Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 4GB
1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.6% Very poor
MC Read 3.6
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 4.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 3.6
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3125 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 3125

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback