Today's hottest deals

Emachines ET1330/ET1331

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines ET1330/ET1331  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines MCP61PM-GM
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091210
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 01 '20 at 05:55
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 905e
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 66.9
1-Core 35
2-Core 69.1
38% 57 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 105
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
HP(103C 82FC) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 451.48
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 62.9
Parallax 61.6
51% 62.4 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 62.3
Splatting 65.4
54% 66 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD easys tore 480GB
352GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EG43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 102 111 131 121 134 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.6% Poor
Read 210
Write 173
Mixed 107
SusWrite 120
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 9.3
40% 12.5 MB/s
DQ Read 17.9
DQ Write 18.4
DQ Mixed 6.5
8% 14.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2 400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
25.8% Poor
MC Read 9.8
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 9.5
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 7.5
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1330/ET1331 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1330/ET1331

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback