User System

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	EVGA 122-CK-NF68
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080904
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 06 '17 at 15:03
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161 34,093 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 74.1 1-Core 48.9 2-Core 96.5 47% 73.2 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 189 24% 184 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340 26,573 User benchmarks, average bench 54% MSI(1462 2015) CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.2.1 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.7% Above average	Lighting 59.8 Reflection 62.6 Parallax 90.9 49% 71.1 fps	MRender 61.8 Gravity 62.5 Splatting 80.8 57% 68.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 57%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apple SS D TS128A 121GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGAB Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.1% Poor	Read 87.3 Write 59.6 Mixed 71.1 16% 72.7 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 29.5 4K Mixed 8.63 43% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 16 DQ Write 37.1 DQ Mixed 9.07 12% 20.7 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 28%
WD WD50 00BPVT-00HXZ 1TB 385GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	34.9% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 64.4 Mixed 59.3 45% 60.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.58 4K Write 2.13 4K Mixed 0.41 109% 1.04 MB/s

Seagate ST9320325AS 320GB-$34 18,767 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 173GB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	Read 58.2 Write 38.3 Mixed 42.8 35% 46.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 0.81 4K Mixed 0.19 49% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 39%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 453GB free Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 117 Write 97.7 Mixed 89.5 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 0.37 4K Mixed 0.22 63% 0.46 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 83%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150 16,916 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 162GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	56% Above average	Read 102 Write 92.8 Mixed 84.1 70% 93.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.06 4K Mixed 0.29 75% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 3.7 14% 5.07 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 5.5 19% 6.57 GB/s	Latency 92.3 43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16