QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory4.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 04 '20 at 16:00
Run Duration54 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 108
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 542
59% 470 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 34GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,619
Write 3044
Mixed 3,314
742% 3,326 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 47
149% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 577
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 549
413% 552 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x6GB
1 of 1 slots used
6GB DIMM RAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback