Tangent C16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7990
MotherboardTangent C16  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 15:17
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6098P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 114
2-Core 174
76% 126 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 316
42% 315 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 72%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7990 (CrossFire Disabled)
AMD(1002 0B2A) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 46.8
114% 46.8 fps
Poor: 28% Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAM-1J1 108GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 182 180 141 169 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.3% Good
Read 396
Write 187
Mixed 213
SusWrite 170
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 14.8
114% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 29.2
48% 93 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 64%
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
660GB free
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 161 114 76 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 166
Write 154
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 138
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 21.2
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 20.6
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback