HP p7-1207c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP p7-1207c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2ACD
Memory3.7 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 11 '20 at 23:08
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3620 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Memory 50.7
1-Core 33.8
2-Core 68.6
32% 51 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 134
18% 132 Pts
64-Core 125
8% 125 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
445GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 101 105 110 100 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64% Good
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 69
SusWrite 103
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
168% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 64%
Great: 69%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB
14GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.7 10 10 9.1 10 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 13.2
Mixed 21.4
SusWrite 10.8
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 2.5
161% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451U6AFR8C-PB HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 6GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.8% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p7-1207c Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP p7-1207c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback