Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W530  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3227-A1
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150108
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '17 at 18:27
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$132
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 581
60% 481 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.8% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 63.7
Parallax 57.6
48% 60.2 fps
MRender 68
Gravity 56.9
Splatting 50.7
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
200GB free
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 406
Mixed 413
98% 442 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 49.3
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 353
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 129
136% 228 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 134%
Micron_m 600_MTFDDAK256MB 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 518
Write 468
Mixed 492
110% 492 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 39.1
158% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 78.3
108% 202 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23
75GB free
Firmware: 12.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 53.3
Write 62.2
Mixed 56.5
43% 57.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.26
80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 69%
WD My Passport 2TB
443GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 71.1
Write 77.3
Mixed 55.9
87% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.09
4K Mixed 0.17
79% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16.9
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CELSIUS W530 Builds (Compare 364 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback