Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	322% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191030
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 12 '20 at 09:53
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Memory 91.3 1-Core 146 2-Core 288 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 579 8-Core 1,093 100% 836 Pts	64-Core 1,086 67% 1,086 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Sapphire(174B A548) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.6% Average	Lighting 54.7 Reflection 52.5 Parallax 45.9 45% 51 fps	MRender 44.3 Gravity 48.1 Splatting 48.7 39% 47 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00007 1TB 2,588 User benchmarks, average bench 261% 779GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXF7102Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1526 2115 1646 1558 1569 1570 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	322% Outstanding	Read 2,464 Write 2,276 Mixed 1,767 SusWrite 1,664 458% 2,043 MB/s	4K Read 58.7 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 76.2 249% 84.1 MB/s	DQ Read 800 DQ Write 1,200 DQ Mixed 866 693% 955 MB/s
Poor: 143% ↑ This bench: 322% Great: 371%
WD 6400AAC External 640GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 580GB free, PID 1003 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	21.9% Poor	Read 34.7 Write 35.9 Mixed 30.4 SusWrite 41.4 49% 35.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.7 111% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 21.9% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	85.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.4 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 24.2 87% 30.4 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 35.4 SC Mixed 25.7 77% 26.9 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,631 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	896x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	700x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	580x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	486x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	440x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	392x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	512x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	324x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	167x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	495x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	313x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 83% - Excellent

Total price: $545

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16