Apple iMac18,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac18,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-BE088AF8C5EB4FA2
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200424
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 13 '20 at 11:28
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$88
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 78
1-Core 114
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 437
59% 440 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 570
Apple(106B 0163) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
37.7% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 52
Parallax 55.9
38% 51.4 fps
MRender 53.4
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 43.8
38% 46.6 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Indmem DMPG3N 512GB
313GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 266 538 223 251 271 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,426
Write 1,388
Mixed 1,034
SusWrite 329
233% 1,044 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 32.4
126% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 888
DQ Write 436
DQ Mixed 152
249% 492 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 145%
Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x434D535831364758344D32413234303043313620 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 28.8
85% 29.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 32
SC Mixed 19.9
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac18,3 Builds (Compare 428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Apple iMac18,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback