| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 267% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS H770 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNB2AD |
| Memory | 28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180220 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 16 '20 at 15:17 |
| Run Duration | 115 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6
Onboard, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
|
82.9%
Excellent
|
65% 125 Pts
|
62% 489 Pts
|
35% 562 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD Graphics P630
Fujitsu(10CF 1965) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263
|
3.79%
Terrible
|
2% 5.24 fps
|
7% 8.65 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
329GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1421 1278 1586 1658 1653 1603 MB/s
|
267%
Outstanding
|
307% 1363 MB/s
|
182% 55.1 MB/s
|
909% 1,215 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 18ASF2G72HZ-2G3B1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.9%
Average
|
52% 18.4 GB/s
|
25% 8.73 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical CELSIUS H770 Builds (Compare 66 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H770
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E3-1505M v6IntelBench 70%, 4,124 samples | 34x |
| Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples | 12x |
| Core i7-7820HQIntelBench 63%, 15,851 samples | 12x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro M2200NvidiaBench 19%, 2,904 samples | 21x |
| HD Graphics P630IntelBench 5%, 3,370 samples | 21x |
| HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples | 20x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |