Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20LXS0A500

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.81% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20LXS0A500  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20LXS0A500
Memory10.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190916
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateJul 19 '20 at 18:01
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 54.4
1-Core 50.9
2-Core 206
53% 104 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 494
52% 419 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 506B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7810
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
5.81% Terrible
Lighting 7.87
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 8.22
6% 9.21 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 7.23
Splatting 0.04
5% 6.55 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.81%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 31 57 58 57 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
28.4% Poor
Read 48.5
Write 75.2
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 50.4
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 67%
SDHC 31GB
29GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 22 21 21 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 84.5
Write 20.3
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 21.5
29% 39 MB/s
4K Read 7.4
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 4
829% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4SFD824A.M16FE 859B CT16G4SFD824A.C16FE 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.9% Good
MC Read 26.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 24.9
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 11.6
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback