Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130 18,336 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Memory 62.1 1-Core 64 2-Core 72.8 43% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 112 8-Core 130 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 113 7% 113 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Dell(1028 0440) 3.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.9% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.94 1% 0.99 fps	MRender 1.52 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.65 1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.9% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$130 75,831 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 47GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,032 Write 1,760 Mixed 1,571 398% 1,788 MB/s	4K Read 110 4K Write 82.4 4K Mixed 67 295% 86.3 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 388 DQ Mixed 392 289% 379 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 114%
Hitachi HTS722010K9SA00 100GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 77GB free Firmware: DC2ZC75A SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 64 64 64 64 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 64.2 Write 63.7 Mixed 36 SusWrite 63.8 42% 56.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 136% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 37%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 9905428-051.A00LF CE80 M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.9 21% 7.47 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.3 13% 4.7 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	881x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 9%, 39,662 samples	332x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	53x

SSD
PC SN530 WDC 256GBNvmeBench 148%, 2,021 samples	99x
SN530 NVMe WDC 256GBPCBench 145%, 4,455 samples	50x
KBG40ZNS512G KIOXIA 512GBNvmeBench 158%, 4,729 samples	49x

RAM
HMAA1GS6CJR6N-XN 1x8GBUnknownBench 32%, 13,137 samples	250x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	95x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 34%, 7,899 samples	51x