Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-870A-USB3  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '20 at 23:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 B65
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 60.4
2-Core 121
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 236
32% 238 Pts
64-Core 241
15% 241 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 260X-$120
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.7.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23.6% Poor
Lighting 29.2
Reflection 32
Parallax 33.7
24% 31.6 fps
MRender 26.3
Gravity 27
Splatting 30.9
23% 28.1 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20150213
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 188 194 200 199 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
60% Good
Read 424
Write 201
Mixed 200
SusWrite 194
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 11.9
82% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 75
83% 139 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 60%
Great: 83%
Hitachi HDT725040VLA360 400GB
373GB free
Firmware: V5COA7EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 65 64 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 64.6
Write 61.7
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 64.2
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
40.4% Average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 9.3
MC Mixed 14.5
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 67.1
60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-870A-USB3 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-870A-USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback