Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3398
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 29 '20 at 13:42
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470S CPU @ 2.90GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 188
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 356
48% 356 Pts
64-Core 354
22% 354 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 3398) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.75% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.77
Parallax 1.38
2% 1.65 fps
MRender 3.62
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 3.52
2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.75%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RCESSD 128GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0226A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 416 420 111 101 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 476
Write 402
Mixed 388
SusWrite 251
85% 379 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 23.2
109% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 38.5
98% 204 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
50.5% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 USDT Builds (Compare 549 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 USDT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback