Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac19,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple iMac19,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-AA95B1DDAB278B95
Memory35.2 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '20 at 02:31
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.7
1-Core 153
2-Core 302
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,037
99% 818 Pts
64-Core 1,202
74% 1,202 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 580X
Apple(106B 0195) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1200 MHz, MLim: 1695 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Lighting 66.2
Reflection 62.6
Parallax 86.1
54% 71.6 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 65.2
Splatting 49.8
48% 59.2 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 287 286 280 274 271 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 325
Write 275
Mixed 280
SusWrite 279
65% 290 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 20
69% 19.5 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 156
113% 148 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E3 HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Micron 16ATF2G64HZ-2G6E3 40GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384, 4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.4% Excellent
MC Read 28.4
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 25
82% 28.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 38.1
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28.2 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac19,1 Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft

System: Apple iMac19,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback