Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2640 0 1,139 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 156 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 298 8-Core 486 48% 392 Pts	64-Core 1,131 70% 1,131 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000 8,609 User benchmarks, average bench 7% HP(103C 0780) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 276.28 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 599GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 484GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 52 51 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Read 148 Write 50.8 Mixed 45.3 SusWrite 51.1 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.7 145% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	44.9% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 16.1 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.6 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 106%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	114x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16