Today's hottest deals

Amazon i3en.metal

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive29.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory768GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 768GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon i3en.metal  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon Not Specified
Memory749.8 GB free of 768 GB @ 2.7 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 07 '20 at 03:21
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
CPU0, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 192
67% 119 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 776
68% 576 Pts
64-Core 3,255
202% 3,255 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 1TB
902GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 117 222 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Read 375
Write 195
Mixed 272
SusWrite 56.5
50% 225 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 6.7
4K Mixed 7.9
36% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 70%
Nvme Amazon EC2 NVMe 7.5TB
55.5TB free
Firmware: 0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,235
Write 4,025
Mixed 2,086
627% 2,782 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 96.2
4K Mixed 30.4
131% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 1,002
750% 995 MB/s
Poor: 173% Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK H... 767GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
147% Outstanding
MC Read 52.3
MC Write 78.6
MC Mixed 56.4
178% 62.4 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback