Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo FA495SIT23

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	137% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Lenovo FA495SIT23 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO FA495SIT23
Memory	14.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190111
Uptime	15.1 Days
Run Date	Aug 09 '20 at 12:31
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U w/ Radeon Vega Mobile Gfx 1,126 User benchmarks, average bench 56% FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	61.5% Good	Memory 64.4 1-Core 80.7 2-Core 168 59% 104 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 518 51% 417 Pts	64-Core 521 32% 521 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 10 Graphics 696 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Legend(17AA 5125) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 13.9 Parallax 20.8 12% 16.5 fps	MRender 11.7 Gravity 16.6 Splatting 17.3 13% 15.2 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 12%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kxg5aznv256g NVMe SED TOSHIBA 256GB 112 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: AADA5102 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 300 298 284 235 246 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	137% Outstanding	Read 1,419 Write 1,019 Mixed 358 SusWrite 288 170% 771 MB/s	4K Read 21.6 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 32.1 131% 54.1 MB/s	DQ Read 439 DQ Write 582 DQ Mixed 626 441% 549 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 195%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CTD Ramaxel RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 24GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	60.7% Good	MC Read 23.5 MC Write 21.8 MC Mixed 20 62% 21.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.9 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 18.2 55% 19.1 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 72%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $285	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $154	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $320

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback