User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 15% Surfboard	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

System	ECT A_M_I
Motherboard	Gigabyte 970A-UD3P
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130806
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 20 '17 at 15:10
Run Duration	277 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320-$129 106,454 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	Memory 77.6 1-Core 47.7 2-Core 100 48% 75.2 Pts	4-Core 185 8-Core 253 28% 219 Pts	64-Core 269 17% 269 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% PowerColor(148C 3001) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.6% Poor	Lighting 32.4 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 66.5 26% 43.7 fps	MRender 30.5 Gravity 49.3 Splatting 40 33% 40 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 437GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC47 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 118 74 199754248 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1012 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 17386618440 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 5163 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1002 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 7505 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295098385 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 64 387252247 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 161 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2826 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 38654705687 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 8 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 8 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17905718662143 (F1) Unknown 100 253 42264280754 (F2) Unknown 100 253 58293650895	60.2% Good	Read 104 Write 106 Mixed 116 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.34 81% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 112%
USB007 mini-USB2BU 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1167 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.83% Terrible	Read 24.1 Write 5.81 Mixed 6.25 12% 12 MB/s	4K Read 8.65 4K Write 0.009 4K Mixed 0.008 33% 2.89 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.83% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT102464BA160 1x8GB 1,194 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	MC Read 10.2 MC Write 9.1 MC Mixed 8.9 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 7 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 85.1 47% 85.1 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16