Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateAug 17 '20 at 16:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$89
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 856
81% 674 Pts
64-Core 1,056
65% 1,056 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$225
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.08
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 85.8
Parallax 80.4
77% 87 fps
MRender 119
Gravity 78.9
Splatting 74.3
72% 90.8 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ultra M8V 512GB
302GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 468 467 470 421 391 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 285
Mixed 456
SusWrite 448
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 52.3
193% 70.2 MB/s
DQ Read 320
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 298
226% 304 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 120%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 30.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 30.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 85.7
47% 85.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,254 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback