Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: AMD Opteron 6344 24 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	45.6% Average	Memory 68.3 1-Core 28.4 2-Core 50.3 35% 49 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 266 23% 196 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
LSI MR9260-8i 2TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2.13 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	Read 494 Write 222 Mixed 230 69% 315 MB/s	4K Read 4.69 4K Write 4.66 4K Mixed 0.92 11% 3.42 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 106%
LSI MR9260-8i 240GB 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

Jmicron Corp. 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 2.5TB free, PID 2509 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 155 Write 159 Mixed 107 177% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.2 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 36KSF1G72PZ-1G6K1 4x8GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 16 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27% Poor	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10 MC Mixed 8.7 28% 9.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.2 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: AMD Opteron 63201stBench 51%, 19 samples	2x
CPU: AMD Opteron 61721stBench 41%, 45 samples	1x
CPU: AMD Opteron 62121stBench 48%, 21 samples	1x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	1x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	1x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	1x

SSD
Neutron GTX 240GBCorsair $503Bench 81%, 3,421 samples	1x
2+0 Stripe/RAID0 2TBAMDBench 46%, 247 samples	1x
850 Pro 1TBSamsung $210Bench 105%, 25,365 samples	1x

RAM
M393B2G70QH0-YK0 8x16GBSamsungBench 88%, 60 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL F3-10666CL9-8GBXL 32GBUnknownBench 41%, 13 samples	1x
TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N TS512MKR72V3N 16GBUnknownBench 23%, 4 samples	1x

Value: 3% - Terrible

Total price: $503

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16